| Name |
Comments |
| 55) |
|
| iphone ringtone maker |
| leaveplu(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Greece |
|
Absolutely with you it agree. Idea good, I support.
|
| 54) |
|
| CiscoGlcSxMM |
| alexmacjr(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: epn |
|
ebay epn accounts for sale
all countries available
ebay partner network accounts for sale, instant
uk, us locals
email forexseller777 --->>>> gmail.com
|
| 53) |
|
| Erotikalia |
| paulixx(at)sexcamsex(dot)org |
Location: Live Sex Cam land |
|
Ihr habt eine schoene Webseite hier, und vielciht schaut Ihr euch auchmal meine an, ok Sex im Internet ist nicht jedermans Sache, aber eben meine erste Homepage. Danke und macht weiter so!
|
| 52) |
|
| Fulubsdials |
| 130(at)manga-kensei(dot)com |
Location: Eritrea |
|
[i]interesting website[/i]
|
| 51) |
|
| stumbtaus |
| Papequamene(at)firstdancer(dot)info |
Location: India |
|
How I can write PM to other users? Thanx
|
| 50) |
|
| katrinvanx |
| paulinchenxx(at)sexcamsex(dot)org |
Location: Sex land |
|
Ihr habt eine schoene Webseite hier, und vielciht schaut Ihr euch auchmal meine an, ok Sex im Internet ist nicht jedermans Sache, aber eben meine erste Homepage. Danke und macht weiter so!
|
| 49) |
|
| Ramonaxxxfan |
| paulinchenxx(at)sexcamsex(dot)org |
Location: Live Sex Cam land |
|
Ihr habt eine schoene Webseite hier, und vielciht schaut Ihr euch auchmal meine an, ok Sex im Internet ist nicht jedermans Sache, aber eben meine erste Homepage. Danke und macht weiter so!
|
| 48) |
|
| Student Loan Refinance |
| chuultsch20(at)hotmail(dot)com |
Location: - |
|
I'll come back again to read your upcoming post! Good job done!
|
| 47) |
|
| paulinchenxx |
| paulinchenxx(at)sexcamsex(dot)org |
Location: Livesex Stripland |
|
Ihr habt eine schoene Webseite hier, und vielciht schaut Ihr euch auchmal meine an, ok Sex im Internet ist nicht jedermans Sache, aber eben meine erste Homepage. Danke und macht weiter so!
|
| 46) |
|
| zebxilson4 |
| zebxilson4(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk |
Location: Puerto Rico |
|
Stop hack the program!!!
|
| 45) |
|
| Naickyhaidway |
| 657(at)26up(dot)com |
Location: Russia |
|
Need Some Advice
4 hours ago I got a message from 9722840600 / 972-284-0600 and for some reason thought the caller was a scammer.
I'm so sick and tired of promotional calls - I decided to complain to the the company (Gulf Coast Western) and screamed at the top of my lungs.
I really screwed up... Gulf Coast Western -- the oil drilling company- called me back was calling to tell me I got the job!
I think I'm soooo fired!!!!!!!
|
| 44) |
|
| sekzqueen |
| isadinger(at)gawab(dot)com |
Location: US |
|
Hi people! I have heard about new site - vk.com. I didn't use it, but some guys who was, say that it's much better than facebook! Is it true? Does anyone here using VK?
|
| 43) |
|
| Shoovowlsoith |
| kevinsulaiman(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: United States |
|
Hey
Really glad to get into this forum
It's what I am looking for.
Hope to know more member here.
|
| 42) |
|
| Shoovowlsoith |
| kevinsulaiman(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: America |
|
Hey
Really glad to get into this forum
It's what I am looking for.
Hope to know more member here.
|
| 41) |
|
| Shoovowlsoith |
| kevinsulaiman(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: USA |
|
Hey
Really glad to get into this forum
It's what I am looking for.
Hope to know more member here.
|
| 40) |
|
| Lauccistdrist |
| 51(at)greatcruisetips(dot)info |
Location: Barbados |
|
Have you heard of let off cancel phone lookup sites that subsist on the internet? People may be skeptical to conjecture in them, after having trained websites that offer a variety of unshackled products and services online, but run aground to do so.
Enable to rent out's rather commence by looking at what transpose phone lookup literally means. If there is a landline swarm with you and you do not have a tip as to whose numbers it is or the give a speech to of the individual it belongs to, you can tax your fluke about performing a interchange phone lookup to get in touch with the particulars of the owner. The service can be of exploit in cases like the following: You do not own contacts with mr big, albeit you have their phone number with you. It can also be used if you hunger for to bump into uncover the possessor of the phone number so that you can avoid occupation up the company by mistake. You can espy sundry websites where you order be able to turn up profuse phone lookup of residences or organizations as regards free. You can uniform find details corresponding to toll-free phone numbers.
You sway make an appearance a difficult when you bring into play a lookup utilization on a cubicle phone, because, the directory services that are free of cost indeed do not say records relating to these numbers. This holds verified looking for fax numbers also, because alone carrier
|
| 39) |
|
| Blallieri |
| 51(at)greatcruisetips(dot)info |
Location: - |
|
Possess you heard of out cancel phone lookup sites that exist on the internet? People may be skeptical to conjecture in them, after having accomplished websites that proffer a variety of rid products and services online, but flop to do so.
Let's open next to looking at what quash phone lookup literally means. If there is a landline swarm with you and you do not have a clue as to whose gang it is or the speech of the individual it belongs to, you can tax your luck away performing a backward phone lookup to get the particulars of the owner. The serving can be of avail oneself of in cases like the following: You do not have contacts with superstar, albeit you fool their phone number with you. It can also be used if you crave to stumble on the possessor of the phone figure so that you can shun pursuit up the several through mistake. You can see disparate websites where you wish be adept to turn up multitudinous phone lookup of residences or organizations as regards free. You can uniform rumble details corresponding to toll-free phone numbers.
You strength veneer a problem when you from a lookup handling on a stall phone, because, the directory services that are free of expenditure truly do not maintain records relating to these numbers. This holds verified looking for fax numbers also, because only carriers or companies in the telecommunications sector keep these details wit
|
| 38) |
|
| AtonAttaito |
| 117(at)manga-kensei(dot)com |
Location: Belize |
|
I'm fresh at this board & I've needed to tell hello to everybody
I have been watching this web site for couple of days and it appeared like a really nice place to be a part of.
|
| 37) |
|
| anydaymop |
| 603(at)26up(dot)com |
Location: Vietnam |
|
Todd Cowle Municipal Bond Credit Report synthesizes, analyzes and presents aggregate credit information and trends in the municipal bond market. The report includes municipal bond rating information from the three major rating agencies – Moody’s Investor Services, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings.
|
| 36) |
|
| mikejohnsonrules |
| johnsonjones20(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: USA |
|
Hello. My wife and I bought our house about 6 months ago. It was a foreclosure and we were able to get a great deal on it. We also took advantage of the 8K tax credit so that definitely helped. We did an extensive remodeling job and now I want to refinance to cut the term to a 20 or 15 year loan. Does anyone know any good sites for mortgage information? Thanks!
Mike
|
| 35) |
|
| #@*%! |
| josephinewalik(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Oman |
|
What is captcha code?, pls provide me captcha code codes or plugin, Thanks in advance.
|
| 34) |
|
| johnnylawisit |
| johnnylaw(at)mail(dot)ru |
Location: USA |
|
So I think that there is good information here. Thanks for the contribution!
|
| 33) |
|
| Blebyrab |
| blooromomeoutlirl(at)mail(dot)saratov(dot)com |
Location: USA |
|
...please where can I buy a unicorn?
|
| 32) |
|
| BubcedUnconee |
| 30(at)boorek(dot)com |
Location: Italy |
|
Not sure it's the right place to share this but I got a cool link that offers a free live signature for people, Ijust tried it on and it rocks! It's called my live signature. Just wanted to share my excitement.
|
| 31) |
|
| BubcedUnconee |
| 30(at)boorek(dot)com |
Location: Italy |
|
Just sharing that I'm working on a new cool signature using the amazing mylivesignature service (got the link from a friend).
|
| 30) |
|
| LnddMiles |
|
Location: Romania |
|
 Tuesday, 28. July 2009 03:52 AM
Pretty cool post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say
that I have really liked reading your blog posts. Anyway
I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!
|
| 29) |
|
| Mare |
|
Location: Oakdale PA |
|
 Wednesday, 19. March 2008 06:40 PM
I came upon your sight while helping a family member who has been falsely accused.
I think his ex and yours must be twins because your stories are so similar!!!! I'm so sorry to hear you have given up but understand completely. Something has to be done to change our family courts!!! God Bless you and please keep this sight going. It was a relief in one sense to know others have the same type of ex.
|
| 28) |
|
| Lisa |
|
Location: - |
|
 Thursday, 15. November 2007 03:55 PM
Hello Heather.
I don't think anyone checks this page anymore. Maybe you can help me - my kids' dad acts like I'm supposed to put up with any and everything nasty he wants to say to me and then says that he can't see the kids or call because I said something back in defense.
|
| 27) |
|
| Heather |
|
Location: - |
|
 Wednesday, 14. November 2007 12:02 PM
As someone who can see both sides I can honestly say that Stacy is a freak. I know how vindictive bio-moms can be when they have ben scorned and they just can't get over it and I can see all the traits in Stacy's posts. You need help Stacy. You really need to stop all the viciousness and let the kids be with their father with no fear of what you will say or do to them. They deserve to love their father. By calling their father names you are pretty much calling them names too because they are a part of him as well. And vice versa for Dave. You 2 created these children. They are parts of you. Get over it and think of the kids first. Stop this bullshit, let the kids have their parents and let the step parents love them too! What kids don't deserve the extra love?
Y'all need to get over it and grow up.
|
| 26) |
|
| Lisa |
|
Location: - |
|
 Thursday, 4. October 2007 12:00 PM
 My X confuses the kids with his behavour. He refuses to talk to them on my cell phone but since I don't have a house phone, then that means that he won't talk to them for over a week. If me or the children call from my cell he just doesn't answer and later tells them not to call from my phone. What am I supposed to do then??
|
| 25) |
|
| Stacy |
|
Location: - |
|
 Saturday, 13. January 2007 06:32 PM
Stacy continues to do everything in her power to interfere with the father’s relationship with the children.****I HAVE NOT INTERFERED WITH ANYONES VISITATION, PHONE CONTACT, NOR MAIL CONTACT. DAVE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS INTERFERED WITH VISITATION PRIVLEGES IN THE LAST THREE MONTHS BY NOT CONTACTING HIS CHILDREN.**** And in her usual fashion blames the father for her behavior.*****THERE IS NOT ONE THING WRONG WITH MY BEHAVIOR.*** She refuses to discuss lump sum payment of over $4000 dollars in back child support and to let “court ordered” visitation resume.*****I DON'T SEE WHERE DISCUSSING THE 4000.00 IN BACK CHILD SUPPORT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH VISITATION. LAST TIME I READ THE LETTER THE STIPULATIONS ON THE ONE LUMP SUM WERE THE CHILDREN COULD HAVE THIER MONEY IF I HANDED OVER WRIGHTS TO THE TAX CREDIT UNTIL THEY WERE 18.**** Despite her silence, Stacy continues to be the most frequent visitor to this website with average of 3 visits per day.****I AM NOT ON HERE 3 TIMES A DAY, I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS USE OF THIS COMPUTER AT WORK, AND FOR THAT MATTER I CAN COME TO THIS WEB SITE AS MANY TIMES AS I WISH. IT IS ABOUT MY PERSONAL LIFE AND MY CHILDREN, I LIKE SEEING WHAT BULL SHIT LIES YOU DREAM UP IN YOUR SICK AND TWISTED MIND***** Mostly she looks at the guestbook and pictures of my new family.******I DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR FAMILY, I JUST HOPE FOR THIER SAKE YOU HAVE FINALLY LEARNED HOW TO LOVE SOMEONE BESIDES YOUR SELF***AND AS FAR AS THE CHILDRENS PICTURES GOES I DON'T NEED TO LOOK AT THE ONES THAT YOU HAVE PUT ON HERE BECAUSE I HAVE PLENTY OF MY OWN FROM THIER VACATION IN WASHINGTON STATE AND THE DAILY PICTURES I TAKE OF THEM AT HOME.********
I continue to grieve for my children but I know I am not the victim here.***Asaparent I wanted Zach and Mirrissa to grow up with their biological father in their lives. But I know they are strong, adaptable and resilient. And they will survive, just like children who grow up with far less. Kids will always be in my thoughts and I will never stop loving them and wishing they could be part of my life. I am filled with sadness and anger when I think of my children, but I can no longer afford to dwell on the negative. I am going to do my best to focus my attention to the people who have loved and supported me all these years. I have been blessed with a new family and we have plans for a fulfilling future together. I will be happy. *****OH NO DAVE IS NOT THE VICTIM HERE THAT IS THE FIRST SENSIBLE THING THAT I HAVE HEARD COME OUT OF YOUR MOUTH IN THE LAST 5 YEARS. THE KIDS ARE WITH OUT THIER BIOLOGICAL FATHER BY YOUR CHOICE NOT THIERS OR ANYONE ELSES. THEY DON'T TELL YOU DADDY DON'T CALL US ON THE PHONE, DADDY DON'T WRITE US, DADDY DON'T COME SEE US. THAT IS ALL YOU. YOU WILL NO LONGER PUT THIS BULLSHIT ON ME. I WILL NEVER TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR LACK OF BEING A RESPONSIBLE ADULT MUCH LESS, THE LACK THERE OF BEING A RESPONSIBLE FATHER.
Loving BM/SM and BM again:
Stacy,
To your first point- No not you, then who??? Are you Jekyl and Hyde and don't know it? You do realize that your repeated attempts to clear your name here only further strike you down, since your reasoning skills are seriously lacking.
To your last- It takes two adults to coparent Stacy. As a custodial parent to my DD, I know this point only too well. You can't lay it all in his lap and say you aren't a part of this. He has to have unmitigated (friendly and compliant, not argumentative) access to his kids in order to have contact with them. You are as responsible as he is in his ability to see and coparent your children as the custodial parent. Well actually you are even more responsible than he is in providing him access to his children on a daily basis and speaking with his children about him in a very positive light.
You stating your complete lack of responsibility, after he has decided that the harranging with you constantly just to see his children once in a blue moon is not worth what it puts your children through. Well that speaks volumes to the integrity of your character as a person and even more to the maturity level with which you function. Knowledge is power, the power to change oneself for the better. Ignorance is chosing to be ignorant to the knowledge that is abundantly existing in your everyday life. Ignorance does not equal bliss, it equals guilt, rage and anger against oneself turned outward on others. I guess we know where that leaves you.
Zachary and Mirrissa,
I hope one day you see this site and have the opportunity to make your own decisions as to what you believe. I wish for your sakes that your parents are able to work a true coparenting relationship out that allows you both full access to whole relationships with both parents. You both deserve true unconditional love from both of your parents and I hope one day you receive it.
Blessings to you both!
|
|
| 24) |
|
| Heather |
| turkiye70(at)hotmail(dot)com |
Location: Kennewick, WA |
|
After reading through Dave's story, I remember why I was interested in the legal field so many years ago. My cousin went through a similar situation. The last time he saw his daughter was when she was 5 years old. Not because he didn't want to, but because his ex-wife lived under the radar and kept her hidden. He was in the military living in Germany and his wife refused to follow him there. She filed for divorce and got custody even though there were several reasons why she was an unfit mother. The judge was biased towards her because he was a reformed alcoholic and felt that she could change if she could get through drug rehab, which she had been through before and continued to falter. The Judge was removed from the bench years later for a DUI. He finaly found her this summer, now almost 20, married, and became a grandfather for the first time just a month later. She grew up not listening to her mother's lies and making up her own mind about the situation and if she wanted to have a relationship with her dad now that they found each other. She never got the letters and gifts that he had sent over the years that he did know where she was. She was told that he abandoned her and never wanted her. She didn't believe this because she found letters that my cousin had written to her mother that states just the opposite. Her mother never knew she found those. She was excited to find him and was even more happy to find that she had a whole family that was eager to see her again. I had just graduated from high school when the custody battle started and changed my degree from Accounting to Legal Secretary that following fall because of it. I finally continued on to get my Paralegal and graduated this summer. Now, I'm not sure that I would make the best guardian ad litem because I think I would get too emotional involved. So, that is not the field that I chose to specialize in, but I would still like to try to do some good.
A note to Stacy. You said that you are going to allow your children to make up their own minds as they grow and let them know what's going on. Have you allowed them to see Dave's journals that he's posted here? There are so many situations where a person's perception is just that. They need to know all sides of the story rather than just the one you are giving, in order to come up with their own decisions on the matter.
As others have stated, it is abuse to use the children in a manner to get back at the other. The children had nothing to do with the divorce. They are innocent victims in this. As another stated, if you wanted full custody, you deserve to pay for full support, not the non-custodial parent. That was your choice to make.
I know that the law doesn't make sense in that instance. Maybe my heart is in the right place to see if I can do some good in the legal field, but it is still up to the courts to decide no matter how we may feel.
Dave was one of the first friends I made when I moved to Kennewick in 1982. I'm proud of his accomplishments. He was always a good friend to me. Knowing his personality, I know that he is a loving father and it would take a lot for him to relinquish his relationship with his own children in hopes that they would have a better life without the constant conflict. As far as his not writing or calling them, that has nothing to do with how he feels about them. I can see them not receiving the letters or the phone calls because they are being screened. If you feel they should have a relationship with him, why don't you allow them to write to him or call him? Like I said, punishing the children because your relationship didn't work is selfish and childish on your part. Children are much more observant that they are given credit for.
I also came from a 16 year relationship which was constantly in turmoil. I couldn't have children, which was part of the problem in his eyes. But, knowing the situation I was in, I would not have wanted to bring children into that as it was. I feel it would have ended the same way this has if I had.
To the kids, should you get to read these comments: Please know that your Dad loves you no matter how it may seem. His absense does not mean that he doesn't care. It means that he cared enough not to constantly have you endure the turmoil. I hope that you are happy and healthy and that some day I may get to meet you too.
|
| 23) |
|
| stacy |
|
Location: - |
|
 Wednesday, 27. December 2006 07:59 AM
Here Dave seems how you havn't had time to add the section in here about the payment for child support. I want everyone to read the true letter instead of your distorted version.
From : John Whited <john.whited@comcast.net>
Sent : Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:40 AM
To : stacy_erickson8@hotmail.com, DavidPrather@Tampabay.rr.com
Subject : (no subject)
| | | Daves bull... | Inbox
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment : IRStaxexemptionreleasef8332.pdf (0.05 MB), www.irs.gov_pub_irs-pdf_f8332.pdf (0.05 MB)
Mrs. Erickson/Sexton,
I am the attorney who represented Mr. Prather at the injunction hearing a few weeks ago. I understand that he owes approximately $4,000.00 in back child support. As you know, Mr. Prather is ordered to repay the arrearage at the rate of $50.00 monthly. We could work out an arrangement whereby he repays that in a lump sum immediately, if you are in agreement.
Attached are a file and the corresponding web link on the IRS site for a form releasing the yearly exenption for the children to the non-custodial parent. If you will execute that form, releasing the exemption until the children are no longer dependent and return it, he will pay the arrearage now.
Obviously, this needs to be arranged in such a way that both you and he are protected and comfortable that the terms of the agreement are carried out. I look forward to hearing from you.
Thank you.
Anthony:
Dave: Is she *really* posting an email that proves you're trying to pay this debt off all at once.. and she's COMPLAINING about it? I'm a simple minded person, so perhaps I'm missing a point here.
(SARCASM) You really are a jerk for trying to take care of the situation as quickly as possible so you can have access to your children. How dare you. (/SARCASM)
|
Loving BM/SM and BM again:
Sure appears that way to me too Anthony. Bizarre isn't, how twistedly one's perception of black and white print can be?!! I'm always amazed (my DH's Ex see's print in the same bizarre mentality). Very similar to one of her attempts at proving how bad we were at communicating with her by providing copies of visitation journals to the court. It only further proved of course that we were communicating with her even when she was making it extremely difficult to do so and that we were be very attentive to her DD's care. Sure looks like the same skewed bent on this copied document as well. No shocker I suppose after reading her previous postings.
Too bad her twisted form of perception has to impact her children so severely!!!
|
|
| 22) |
|
| Wesley Smith |
| liamsdad(at)liamsdad(dot)org |
Location: dublin, VA |
|
Lots of great he said / she said stuff here. I don't dig thru it but I will say any custodial mother (or father) who does not allow and encourage their children to spend time with the other parent is a horible person and is comitting child abuse. They can lie to themselves and their children but it is still abuse. You chose to have a child with the other parent, deal with it.
Second using your own child to extort "child support" payments is another form of abuse, its putting greed ahead of what is good for your child, and makes you nothing more than a "welfare queen", as welfare is exactly what "child support" is.
As a side note, besides being immoral, "child support" is also illegal if you have taken away the other parents rights. If you asked for the right of sole custody you must assume the obligation of sole support:
The duty to support children is based largely upon the right of a parent to their custody and control. Patron v. Patron, 40 Va. Cir. 379 (1996); Butler v. Commonwealth, 132 Va. 609, 614; 110 S.E. 868 (1922). A parent cannot be compelled to pay support unless he or she has refused or failed to provide for them where he or she lives. Butler, 132 Va. at 614.
There must be a reciprocal and corresponding right and duty. You cannot have one without the other. A "child's right to support and the parent's right to custody and services are reciprocal". RUBINO V. MORGAN, 638 N.Y.S.2d 524, 525, 224 A.D.2d 903 (3rd Dept. 1996). And BOWEN V. GILLIARD, 483 U.S. 587, 107 S. Ct. 3008, 97 L.Ed.2d 485 (1987).
|
| 21) |
|
| stacy |
|
Location: - |
|
 Wednesday, 8. November 2006 08:13 AM
That is fine you all can be David backers all you want, My children know the truth and when they are older they will make thier own decision about the things that happen. They do have thier own opinions and thier own ideas because that is how i have taught them and raised them. That is what makes them who they are which is very loving, polite, affectionate and bright children that any parent would be proud of. I know i am doing what is right for my children and in the long run they will thank me when they become productive, well mannered, responsible adults.
Takako:
Stacy,
Your comment here is actually the first sensible thing I have ever heard you say. I actually agree with every sentence.
As you say, the children will make their own decision. What that decision will be is the question. All parents can do is do what each believe is the right thing by them. Who knows what is "right". All of the things I have observed in your behavior as a parent I completely disagree with and disapprove. But I am sure you think the same about Dave and myself. Either way, it is not up to me to judge you.
If the children grow up to be productive, well mannered, responsible adults, you are definitely to be commended. (Although I don't see how you can raise children to be "productive" when all you do is live off of the state or leech off other people, "well mannered" when you have the most foul mouth and poor hygine I have ever seen, and "responsible" is a word for you if you count the reliability with which you blame others for everything as responsible. But hey, best teachers are often not the pest peformers so who knows.. You might be teaching the kids just fine.) At the current rate of parenting time that Dave has with the children, he certainly has no influence on how they grow up, good or bad. And if they turn out good, you are the biggest reason for their success.
I just hope that they realize one day that there are many different worlds out there full of opportunities. That is one thing I know that is a "positive" in children of divorced parents. It is also the reason there needs to be 2 parents in all childrens lives. With exposure to 2 people, they get to learn and benefit from a wider view of the world and different lifestyles. Regardless of your opinion of Dave, kids are half his blood and deserve to learn from him, good or bad. And that is the point I have the biggest problem with you. Even if Dave is a bad parent/person, kids are his too and need to know him good and bad. Nothing in this world is clear cut except the parents love for their child and the child to their parent. Even parents in prison get to see their kids and kids don't stop loving them because they committed a crime.
I hope that you will be able to put your fears and concerns for the children aside enough to let them be with Dave and learn from his example, good and bad. So what if you think he is harrassing you and making life difficult for you, the kids love and need him just the same. It isn't about you. Isn't the kids love for their parents that what counts in the end?
|
|
| 20) |
|
| Anthony |
| throwaway1(at)orbiter(dot)com |
Location: Volusia County, Florida, USA |
|
Dave -
I've looked around a bit here in the past couple of weeks and it's interesting to see what you've gone through. Even if I wear a pair of "see both sides" glasses, taking into account any "bias" that may be on your account of things... Stacy's own postings here show that there is a HUGE problem on her end. She's horribly sidetracked with YOU, and YOU ALONE. As well, some observations:
1. I find it unfortunate that you had to bother going back and forth over these (very pathetic) guidelines that were offered and counteroffered about how the kids are to be maintained. Stacy by her own actions has very severe control issues (lack thereof).
2. Apparently the fact that what happens in each household is 100% NONE OF THE OTHER PARTY'S BUSINESS was totally lost in all of this. That, combined with the apparent lack of intelligence on the part of Stacy's counsel made this all just plain... dumb.
3. I feel for you that your children only see you every couple of weeks. I know when my wife chose divorce so she could continue to "sow her oats" wildly, I made sure, very easily, that she was removed from the picture to the bare minimum (and then she removed herself by moving to California a few months later -- bizarre). My four children live "happily" with me (as much as four children without a mother present can), and that makes me even more sad of your situation.
4. Does Stacy's new "husband"(?!) know that she obsesses over you, visits your website, and posts messages to and/or about you so much?! What gives? Is she dissatisfied with her latest husband or what?
I truly hope your children somehow come out as "well adjusted" as they can.
Anthony
Proud father of the Mighty Four
Daniella 1989
Amanda 1990
Anthony 1991
Christopher 1993
Sad to be divorced,
but happy to be with those he loves.
Anthony:
(replying to an email from stacy_erickson8@hotmail.com, quoted below)
If I were to take the pragmatic approach (as I usually do), I'd say, regardless of how horrible you and David are to your children (or not?), perhaps you should stop coming to a website which (I assume) David does not know about and which has no positive influence on your life. So many of your comments are clear to me as being one-sided. Why would David call a house where he will obviously be monitored and/or chastised, and the kids most likely questioned as to the content of the phone call?
You have no control over David, his time with the kids, whether he cuts their hair or not, whether he has Takako help with "parenting issues", whether he decides to keep them up 48 hours straight, whether he throws a ball with them or gives them real-world knowledge that will actually serve them well later in life... and he has no control over your time, the same way. Somehow you seem to miss that picture in 95% of what you've posted here. You are "divorced" (for lack of a better word). You each have your time with the kids. Why make it miserable?
Your children will be very.. very disgusted with you as they get older and they start to get wind of these issues, and when they eventually read this site and get other information. They will know that their mother did not want them to have a good relationship with their father, including those he loves and lives with, and that you tried to pull puppet strings. I wish I could impress that upon you, but I'm "obviously" a David-backer, so I would assume my words are lost on you.
QUOTED EMAIL, VERBATIM:
Dear Anthony: Dave has put himself in the position that he is in. I do not have control issues, it is called protecting my children, living my life and not letting Mr Prather push me around anymore. You are correct on one thing you say, that it is none of anyones business of what goes on in the other parents household as long as it is not hurting my children.. It is Mr Prathers fault that he does not see his kids as much as he should. For someone whom says that he loves them so much he does not phone them nor does he write them, and for the last month has not seen them per his actions of calling children and family services and filing 2 false reports within a week of each other, Per their suggestion the visitation was suspended for the month of October. And yes my husband knows about the comments that i have posted on the website and he supports me 100% because he has been with me through the court battles and all the endless bullshit that Dave has dished out. It is so nice to be able to be the one that is looking in from the outside, but unless you know everything that has happened instead of just the picture that Dave paints you really have no right to be slinging mudd at me. Because all i really care about is how my kids are being taken care of and making sure that they are being protected from all the not needed bull shit from thier sperm donor of a dad.
|
Anthony (correction):
My apologies: "that David does not know about" above should have read "that David's children does not know about"
|
Takako:
I don't know how much "support" your husband is giving you when you are out of court. But I have never once seen Allen at any of your court dates. Maybe he was hiding in the bushes? I guess he sends his best.
|
|
| 19) |
|
| Tracey |
| leftbehindsm(at)yahoo(dot)ca |
Location: Canada |
|
Stacy:
For somebody who claims to have such a good life and who's "moved on", you seem to spend a lot of time on your ex-husband's website obsessing about the opinions of others. Your continued bitterness and anger will eventually kill you...is this the legacy you want to leave Zach and Mirrissa?
Remember one thing...each and every time you point your finger at somebody else (i.e., David), there are always three pointing back at yourself.
I hope some day you find peace in your life...because right now, you're certainly not demonstrating it.
Left Behind SM
|
| 18) |
|
| Jeri |
|
Location: - |
|
 Monday, 11. September 2006 05:17 PM
David, please email me so that we may talk. thank you. I will no longer pollute your website with this vicious mess that I obviously got myself into. All I want, as I am sure you feel the same, is for my daughter to be cared for. And Stacey I am sorry that my daughter got food on your furniture., Just wondering , how could you tell?
|
| 17) |
|
| stacy |
|
Location: - |
|
 Monday, 11. September 2006 01:13 PM
Jeri: Number 1: I really couldn't care less how you feel about me and I really don't care how anyone else on this website feels about me. They don't know me and either do you. Dave paints him self a piity picture here, But what he doesn't do is put the whole truth on here. He only puts his demented side up for everyone to judge. Number 2: i am not obsessed with David, I couldn't give a shit less what he does in his personal life or what he has or does not have. The only thing i care about is how he treats our children when they are with him. Another thing it is not that i don't let him see them, if you would read closer he has admitted to being the one who chose not to be a part of their lives, not I. Number 3: The child support that Zachary and Mirrissa gets from David isn't any of your business in the first place. Number 3: I couldn't give a shit less if you are jealous or not of my house or anything in it. That is your problem not mine. Number 4: Your child support and visitation issues, you need to discuss that with someone else besides leaving me nasty messages. I have nothing to do with any of that, and most of all you need to leave my children out of it completly. Number 5: I am not mean to your daughter. She is treated just as well as my own children. But I will not tolerate disrespect, Nor will i tolerate calling people SOB's, ro putting food on my furniture just for the shere pleasure of watching to see who is going to sit in it. The only thing that Dakota does not like is that she has to follow the same rules as my children. Number 6: I do not say evil things about David to my children they have to figure that out on thier own. In which they have on quite a few things. But that does not make them stop loving him. He is thier Dad and always will be. That aspect of thier life will never be any of your business. And as far as my personal life, my kids and anything else that has to do with me as long as your daughter is not at our house, it is not any of your damn business.
|
| 16) |
|
| jeri |
|
Location: - |
|
 Saturday, 9. September 2006 08:38 PM
well, I guess stacey read my post, I am so glad about that. I am trying to recall what all I did say on the phone. I was highly pissed. I will have all of you know that I don't feel any jealousy what so ever. As a matter of fact I feel guilt. Stacey called me the week after her and Allen got married crying asking me if Allen ever hit me. I lied and said he did not. Selfish, because I was afraid if things did not work out with the two of them that he would not leave me alone. I am sorry for that. As a matter of fact Stacey I am sorry that I FOUND YOU ON THE INTERNET FOR ALLEN WHEN I WAS LEAVING HIM. AGAIN I WAS SELFISH AND WANTED HIM TO LEAVE ME ALONE. i aI am sorry if I said anything that made you assume that I hold any feelings for your children, because I don't personally have anything against them. you and allen are the ones that I ahve a problem with, all you ever do is talk about david and your child support and how sorry he is when he doesn't pay it. and then your husband would rather die that pay it to me for dakota. you know that I AM NOTHING LIKE YOU. I DON'T BADMOUTH THAT JERK EVERYDAY OF MY LIFE THERE ARE SEVERAL DAYS THAT GO BY WITHOUT HIM EVEN CROSSING MY MIND. I AM NOT OBSESSED WITH HIM OR YOU LIKE YOU ARE WITH YOUR EX. I AM JEALOUS OF NOTHING IN YOU HOME. I HAVE A VERY HEALTHY RELATIONSHIP AND HOMELIFE. THE POLICE DON'T GET CALLED ANYMORE AND CHILD SERVICES HASN'T VISITED SINCE YOU GAVE THEM THAT OBVIOUS LINE OF SHIT. MY CHILDREN DON'T GO INTO ALLEN'SPARENT'S HOUSE BEGGING FOR FOOD, AND THEY LOVE BOTH OF THIER PARENTS BECAUSE I HAVE INSTILLED THAT IN THEM. I LOVE MY CHILDREN AND WANT THEM TO HAVE HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS WITH THIER FATHERS. AND JACCI DOES, BUT YOUR HUSBAND SAID IF I PURSUE CHILD SUPPORT, HE NEVER WANTS TO SEE HIS DAUGHTER AGAIN. MAYBE YOU CAN DEAL WITH YOUR CHILDREN NOT LOVING THIER DAD, SINCE YOU TALK SO NEGATIVELY ABOUT HIM IN FRONT OF THEM. I HOWEVER THROUGH ALL OF THIS DO NOT DO THAT BECAUSE ONE DAY I HOPE ALLEN GETS HIS HEAD OUT OF HIS ASS AND ACTS LIKE A FATHER, AND IF HE EVER DOES, I DON'T WANT MY DAUGHTER'S HEAD TO BE FILLED WITH EVIL THINGS ABOUT HER FATHER, THAT ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY FOR HER TO KNOW. ALTHOUGH, I AM PURSUEING THIS, YOU BOTH HAD TO KNOW THAT ONE DAY, I WAS NOT GOING TO SETTLE FOR NO HELP AT ALL WHEN YOU DRIVE INTO MY DRIVEWAY IN A NEW CAR AND THEN SIT IN MY LIVING ROOM TALKING ABOUT THE HOUSE YOU TWO JUST BOUGHT. I AM NOT DOING THIS OUT OF ANGER, I AM DOING IT OUT OF A NEED FOR HELP IN SUPPORTING MY DAUGHTER. , I APOLOGIZE IF YOU THINK I AM UPSET AT ALL WITH ZACH AND MARISSA AND I AM SURE IF I SAID SOMETHING ON THE MESSAGE IT WAS IN REFERENCE TO THE AWFUL WAY YOU TALK TO DAKOTA AND HOW YOUR CHILDREN ARE TREATED BETTER THAT SHE IS BY YOU. AND THAT IS MY PLACE TO BE CONCERNED, FOR MY CHILD'S SAFETY.ESPECIALLY WITH ALL THAT I HAVE LEARNED ABOUT YOU FROM ALLEN AND ON THIS WEBSITE, I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO LET YOU KNOW, I WILL NOT I REPEAT WILL NOT TOLERATE ANYTHING FROM YOU BUT A SWEET WONDERFUL ATTITUDE TOWARD MY DAUGHTER OR I PROMISE YOU, NEXT TIME MY ANGER WILL BE IN PERSON. AGAIN, SO EVERYONE IS NOT CONFUSED, MY CONCERN IS FOR MY DAUGHTER, FINANCIALLY AND EMOTIONALLY, THANKS DAVID FOR LETTING ME INVADE YOUR WEBSITE WITH MY DILEMA. BUT IT IS A SURE BET THAT YOUR DILUSIONAL, HABITUAL LIAR, IMMORAL , OBSESSED WITH YOU EX WIFE WILL BE ON HERE READING EVERY WORD. BYE
|