Motion to Designate Father to make Educational Decisions

 

            This was drafted by my attorney in response to Stacy taking the kids out of Pine Trail Elementary and putting them in Holly Hill Elementary in the summer of 2004. Kids had attended Pine Trail since the beginning of the year when they joined me in Daytona.

            Zach was in an integrated class with 2nd to 4th graders and for the first time doing well in school. The teacher to student ratio was 4 to 1 and each student studied at their appropriate level for each subject. I could tell that Zach was actually learning and gaining more patience and endurance when tackling school work. He was more comfortable and confident when doing his homework and cared to do a good job. He had always been a good natured kid who is always happy to please and I could tell he thought well of his teachers and doing his best.

            Mirrissa was in first grade and her immaturity was definitely becoming obvious compared to other students. Her teacher has slated her to go into the same class as Zach next year for additional support and recommended counseling and tutoring for her over the summer to help her along. The teacher recommended Mrs. Breter who was named "teacher of the year" recently and specialized in teaching math to young children.  I was happy that she will also be joining a good class and teachers were not going to let her slip through the cracks.

            Stacy on the other hand was very unhappy that the kids contact address was not her address. She went to the registrar and had their registered addresses changed. The Registrar Ruth even told her that if she changed the address they won't be able to come back to Pine Trail next year. Stacy said they need to go to HER school district's school. Throughout this dispute that was her only reason. In response to my argument that Pine Trail was a better school, Stacy replied that all her neighbors' kids attend Holly Hill Elementary and they are all "good people".  Later I found out this was untrue. Zach told me that his friend Dylan and his sister attended private school and never went to Holly Hill Elementary.

            At the hearing, this motion was dismissed and Stacy was allowed to enroll the children at "her" school. The primary reason given by the judge was that he cannot independently designate the father to make any decisions when the main paternity motion had not yet been heard and decided in court. Additionally, the judge said that the children are "not going to Harvard any time soon anyway" and it would make very little difference where they went to elementary school.  Yes that is an exact quote of his words. It infuriates me that the judge could carelessly throw around such statements to decide the fate of my children's education. How would HE feel if HIS children had to attend the worst rated school in the county when they actually had a CHOICE of a better school?  I knew that the judge had raised his family in the "Trails" subdivision located in heart of Ormond Beach and was very familiar with the school system and reputations of the local schools. He knew all that was up against my kids and decided to dismiss them. I guess the judge figures that the world needs more ditch diggers too.

            Holly Hill Elementary had been given a "C" by the State for the year 2004 and parents were receiving vouchers to attend a better school if they chose to do so.  It was clear that parents enrolled their kids in that elementary school only because they had no choice.

            At Holly Hill Elementary, Zachary was consistently making C's for reading and D's for Math. He had A's and B's for Art and PE. I don't know what possesses Stacy to do these things but she told him that he had only "one B and rest were A's" on his report card and took him out to eat to reward him of his good grades. Zach was shocked to find out that his mother had lied to him and that he was actually doing poorly in school. 

            Mirrissa was having constant problems in class unable to focus and complete any little task by herself. Teachers recommended assessment by a professional for ADHD and other disorders along with tutoring and sessions with the school counselor to improve her social skills. Stacy declined all of this.  Her teacher told me that she requires constant supervision from one of the teacher aids or she would not get anything done as well as distract other children. Although her reading skills were at grade level, she rarely did any work at school and never turned in her homework. Her math skills were only a little more than being able to count and add some with her fingers.  By the beginning of 2005, the teachers had to admit that Mirrissa's problems are more than they can handle in the classroom.

            In December of 2004, Stacy moved in with her new boyfriend of one month. His house was located in Palm Coast in the school district of "Indian Trails K to 8". This was a good school so I was happy to learn that the kids will be attending this school starting January.  I openly approved and encouraged her decision during a counseling session with Ms. Jane Devine. The next day, Stacy called me and said she had decided to keep the children in Holly Hill because "they have all of their friends there" and obtained a variance from the school principal.  My anger at Stacy had reached boiling point and I yelled at Stacy for making another "poor decision" that screws the kids over. She argued about how there are "good people" at the school and kids love it there.  I yelled back that why would she get the kids up at 5am drive and take them to the baby sitter to sleep until it was time for school, then  make the kids wait for an hour in front of the school until she got off of work at 3pm. When they could just as easily get up at 7am and WALK to Indian Trails which ALSO happens to be a better school. No that would make too much sense!!!. 

            This incident was one of the "final straws". I realized that no matter what, as long as I was in the picture, Stacy will do everything and anything just to do the opposite of what I wanted. No matter how bad for the kids and inconvenient it would make things for her, she just didn't want me to "get the upper hand".  I came to the conclusion, though reluctantly that it was "I" that was causing Stacy to act like this. All of my efforts to improve life for the kids by trying to be involved in their school, encouraging them participate in extracurricular activities are actually making the kids life worse. Under Stacy's watch the kids would get the minimum of everything. They wouldn't get all the opportunities of a children growing up in a middle class household. But on the other hand, they wouldn't be deprived of good things that happen in their lives either. If I hadn't agreed with her about Indian Trails, she would just probably have let them get themselves up in the morning to attend Indian Trails. It would be too much trouble for Stacy to get them up at 5am and drive additional 30 minutes to drop them off at a babysitter that she has to pay. If she wasn't threatened by my presence she wouldn't be taking them out of school early because she "misses them. She wouldn't falsify Zach's reading log just to make me look bad when I don't sign unless Zach actually does the reading.  It is my presence and my concern for the kids that lead Stacy to be worse than a mediocre parent she is. It doesn't matter what kind of result I got in court. As long as I was in the picture, she would be relentless. Even if I was given the primary residential parent designation, Stacy in her full fury can and will unleash do more damage than ever and make the kids' lives miserable.   How can I let this go on? Am I really doing what is best for the kids? Or am I just doing what I want to do to feel like I am being a father? Maybe the "best" the kids can hope for in life is to get the minimal in every opportunity in life with Stacy as their parent.  After all, they are fed and clothed and do go to school for the most part. They are not exposed to physical or sexual abuse and they aren't living on the street with a crack addict parent.  Lazy as Stacy may be, it is still better than what Stacy can be when threatened.